Last night I was relating a story to Kat that I thought had absolutely nothing to do with swordsmanship... until it occurred to me this morning that maybe it did, in its own oblique way.
Yesterday morning, waiting at the Poughkeepsie train station, I took a seat across from a young 20-something Latino playing an acoustic guitar with an astounding level of technical skill and musical emotion (if it helps to qualify this statement, I trained as a Classical violinist for a good 15 years of my life). Sitting next to him was a guy who, although clearly impressed by the music, just would not shut up; he kept firing a barrage of inane questions at the guitarist,who bore the onslaught with hardly a raised eyebrow, as he continued to play:
"So, are you, ya know, a professional musician?" — "If I get paid some money to play, that makes me a professional, right?"
"Can you read music?" — ::shakes head:: — "Yea, man.. me neither.."
"I like rock guitar best, you know, Les Paul and that shit. You can bend notes on an electric guitar. You ever bend notes?" — "Sure, man" ::plays a scrap of blues, bending notes::
I'll give the guitarist credit for never losing his cool. Finally, though, the man next to him tried to make some sage comment about the instrument, how nice it looks, and asked what kind it is. The guitarist stopped playing, and laughed, saying "I got this at a pawn shop for 30 bucks, man. Cheapest guitar I could find." I couldn't help myself: I raised my hands and said aloud to both of them, "The musical instrument is here," wiggling my fingers.
My point, if it's not already clear, is this: People argue constantly in person and on the forums about efficacy. Efficacy of different weapons, of different permutations of the same type of weapon, of armor, of swordsmen facing each other in an anachronistic setting, etc. But, like the guitarist with the cheap guitar, mastery comes from within. Peter Johnsson can design and create swords that are astounding works of art in their own right. Just like Stradivarius made violins that were—and still are—museum pieces. Without requisite skill, trying to cut with an $8,000 handmade sword would be just as unsuccessful as trying to play a sonata on a $2B Strad. Sure, maybe expensive and superbly crafted tools of the trade help, but they can only do so much on their own; in and out of someone's hands, they are still just a passive object.
Monday, April 4, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Instruments do help one improve one's practice, but they do only help. An unskilled practitioner with a heavy unbalanced sword won't be very good, for certain, but that same unskilled practitioner with a light and balanced sword will still be unskilled. Better equipment does help, and can aid a new student in learning faster, but at the end of the day it is the swordsman who is either good or bad, and the weapon has little to do with it.
ReplyDeleteRegards,
Keith
It has been argued that the Mig 15 was a superior aircraft than the F-86 Saber during the Korean War (yes war, I intended that instead of "conflict")but our Pilots in the inferior F-86 Saber still had a higher kill ratio.....
ReplyDeleteMatt Hagan